Monday, December 19, 2011

The Presbyterian Curmudgeon wishes for a merry Christmas album


With just five days to Christmas, I suppose it's time to officially give up on this year's Christmas offerings. Having been enchanted by She & Him's first two albums, I had high hopes for A Very She & Him Christmas, but said hopes were dashed. Not bad, but it felt like they were much too cool to fully commit themselves in the way a Christmas album demands. Having said that, I did like their rendition of "Baby, It's Cold Outside," in which they reverse the lines assigned to male and female.

As nothing else has emerged to capture my imagination this Yuletide season, I find myself harkening back fondly to Raul Malo's Marshmellow World and Other Holiday Favorites. And being disappointed with She & Him's "Little Saint Nick," I've now determined the definitive version is by Dr. Teeth and the Electric Mayhem on the 1979 classic John Denver & the Muppets: A Christmas Together.

Looks like another round of traditional Christmas tunes for the curmudgelings this year.



Wednesday, December 14, 2011

Christmas Sunday & the marks of the Church


From the time of the Reformation, Protestants have used three "marks" to identify true Churches: the faithful preaching of the Word, the proper administration of the sacraments, and the Biblical exercise of Church discipline. As Westminster Confession of Faith 25.4-5 recognize, these marks are not absolute rules, but are observed on something like a sliding scale, as particular Churches are "more or less pure" according to how purely they exercise these marks.

Two out of these three marks are explicitly liturgical, that is, concerned with the Church's Lord's Day worship, and the third is at least implicitly liturgical. This is why I've come to believe American evangelicalism has definitely begun its slide into apostasy.

Do a Google search for "no Sunday services on Christmas," or something similar, and you'll get a remarkable number of hits. While at least one Denver-area congregation points to the difficulty of using its rented facilities due to the holiday, most of these evangelical congregations (and all the ones I found give every indication of being in the evangelical camp, as opposed to, say, mainline Protestant) either give no explanation or say Christmas is a day to spend with family. As a Christian who has a family which includes small children, I agree that Christmas is certainly a day to spend with family; it's just that Sunday is always a day to spend with family in worship services.

I don't know how to quantify this phenomenon, but I'll guess the number of congregations cancelling Sunday services this December 25, 2011 is fairly small, percentage-wise. Nonetheless, the fact this story is attracting much less attention than it did back in 2005 is telling: the evangelical community has become that much more indifferent to Lord's Day worship. Not hostile, mind you: just indifferent as to whether worship services on the Christian Sabbath are all that necessary to a Church's identity.

Which brings me back to my main point: if a group of people don't even gather together to perform those exercises which might serve as marks of a true Church, can they be considered a Church at all?

Thursday, December 8, 2011

Maybe this will help with my commute


Looks to me like the new spaceport will be in Aurora, but I'm sure Denver will annex it if it starts making any money.

Tuesday, December 6, 2011

Free systematic theology!


I was privileged to study systematic theology under Robert Strimple just a few years before he retired, and was quite pleased when Westminster Seminary California's first endowed chair was named in his honor. While it's not quite the same as being in the classroom, his lectures are now available online as free mp3 downloads. Get 'em while they're hot!


Also good in liquid form


Beer: it's literally a life-saver.

Take that, John MacArthur.


Mmmhop(s)


Dear Hanson,

Please, oh please do not be yanking my chain. Mmmhop(s)? It's a dream come true.

love,
The Presbyterian Curmudgeon

Friday, December 2, 2011

Imposing their religion


NPR ran a story today on Morning Edition about the effort of some Roman Catholic institutions to fight against provisions in federal law requiring employers to provide contraception services in health care plans on the grounds this violates their religious beliefs and doctrinal standards. Sadly, the ACLU, which once upon a time was interested in preserving civil liberties such as those enumerated in the First Amendment, has taken sides against these Roman Catholic institutions. 
But [Sarah] Lipton-Lubet of the ACLU says this isn't a fight about religious liberty.
"What the bishops and their allies are asking for is the ability to impose their religious beliefs on people who don't share them," she said.
Ms. Lipton-Lubet seems sadly irony-impaired, not realizing her organization is joining forces with the federal government of these United States to impose their religious beliefs on people who don't share them.